Exhaustive Futurism
Question: What should things in this table be called?
- Agents
- Entities
Common Dimensions of Historic & Futuristic Analysis
Elements
- Things that will change. Partition?
- Types
- Organizations
- Demographics
- Physical things
- Ideas
- Innovations
- Events
- Element-specific Subdimensions Time
Relationships/Impacts between elements
Knowledge
- Total amount
- EV of existing / new knowledge
- Subdimensions for specifics of research effort.
Intro Resources:
- Obama on AI / National Security: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdhyM5jHu0s
- https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/artificial-intelligence-and-national-security
- https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/AI%20NatSec%20-%20final.pdf
- https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R45178.pdf
Similar to:
Field Names:
- Technology-driven power differentials
- Technology-enabled power grabs
Previous technologies and technology differentials have allowed specific groups to gain power.
- Military technologies / techniques helped the Romans, Mongols, etc. grow substantially.
- The industrial age led to European countries overthrowing and colonizing much of the rest of the world. (guns & steel)
- Nuclear weapons helped the US win WW2 and led to the main power struggles of the cold war.
- The use of Tanks very much changed war from the early WW1 days.
- The use of cannons and similar removed the utility of castles.
Exhaustive Futurism
Entities: Actors / Collectives / Ideas / Technologies
For each, estimate
- How much improvement is correlated with EA values
Recommended Frames / Dimensions
-
Comparative Differences of Agents (Power)
- Existing State Actors
- US
- China
- Russia
- Saudi Arabia
- Iran
- North Korea
- Specific inter-state actors
- USA
- Parties
- Republicans
- Democrats
- Libertarians
- Government Departments
- Executive
- Legislative
- Judicial
- Surrounding
- Lobbyists
- External influence
- Media’s influence
- Issues
- Polarization
- Climate Change
- Authoritarianism
- General government effectiveness / efficiency
- Parties
- USA
- State Actors by Government
- Democratic Governments
- Dictatorial Governments
- Government Agendas
- Economic
- Left
- Center
- Right
- Social
- Left
- Center
- Right
- Economic
- Nonstate actors
- Global alliances
- Powerful individuals
- Coorporations
- Startups
- Large coorporations
- Large coorporations with AI emphases
- Terrorist groups
- Media Agencies
- NGOs
- Open Phil / Good Ventures
- Effective Altruists
- DAOs
- Uncontrolled AIs
- Industries
- Academia
- Law
- Health
- Trade
- Groups by Wealth
- Poor
- Middle Class
- Rich
- Ultra-Rich
- Groups by ownership
- Citizens
- Governments
- Generic Lens:
- All tools & strategies for power
- Gender
- Men
- Women
- Transgender
- Age
- Young vs. Middle Age vs. Old
- Religion
- Catholicism
- Protestant Churches
- Islam
- Judaism
- Athiests
- Cults
- Interests
-
Risks
- Climate Change
- Nuclear Proliferation
- Biorisks
- Animal Cruelty
- Cause Prioritization
- Blockchain Governance
-
General
- Polarization
- Truth & Reporting
- High-integrity media
- Low-integrity media
- Rationality
-
- Existing State Actors
-
Absolute Differences
- Coordination abilities
- General expected stability levels
- Coordination abilities
-
Decisive Strategic Advantage Ways of gaining power
-
Technology development
- AI
- Weapons
-
Financial
- Stock market
- Coorporations
- Theivery
- Thought crime
- Blackmail
- Hacking
-
Social influence
- Political influence
Related research
- There’s lots and lots of military futurism / sci-fi.
- This could meant that work in the area seems unscientific.
- Known organizations?
- US Military Intelligence
- British Intelligence
Existing Frames
- AI and National Security
- Naively wouldn’t focus on power grabs from other groups, which would eventually be an issue of National Security.
- Too much focus on military national attacks.We need to catch groups before they have too much power.
Sources of benefit:
- Identify the main trends to notice for generic decision making
- Many ideas you may not have thought to consider.
- Find what areas may be the most modifiable, change those areas
There’s a conflict between specificity vs. generality
Question: How effective is Open Phil? What areas are they leaving out?
Question: How effective is it to change academic opinion?
What are the ways of changing academic focus / emphasis? / research
https://www.wsj.com/articles/paying-professors-inside-googles-academic-influence-campaign-1499785286
- Think Tanks
- Convince funding
- Convince owners
- Convince researchers
- Academia
- Convince Academics
- Change funding
- Change university emphasis
Dimensions of Historic & Futuristic Analysis
Section titled “Dimensions of Historic & Futuristic Analysis”Futurism as a field generally attempts to understand the future, but the future is highly multidimensional. One may ask how futurist research can most effectively cover all potential territory and ensure that there aren’t any large areas underexplored. I think one way to begin is with a good ontology.
Ontologies can be used to help map out the space of existing and possible futurist research. On a high level, I think it’s useful to begin the ontology by identifying a few distinct axis or dimensions.
Below is one first draft at a dimension outline. I hope it could eventually be improved, but find it useful for now. I wouldn’t be too surprised if other organizations have made similar attempts that I don’t know about. One thing I noticed when doing this is that creating an ontology for the future is probably very similar to creating one for the past (somewhat obviously in retrospect), though I imagine in practice they may be used differently.
The outline is below. I’ll explain the main parts underneath it.
- Time
- Causes of change (Changers) (Elements)
- Recipients of change (Changees) (Elements)
- Change type
- Subdimensions for specifics of elements
- Researcher Knowledge
- Types
- Total amount
- Expected Value
- Existing or expected knowledge
- Subdimensions for specifics of research efforts
- Types
- Elements (As changers or changees)
- Types
- Organizations
- Demographics
- Physical things
- Ideas
- Innovations
- Events
- Relationships between Elements
- Element-specific subdimensions
Elements
Section titled “Elements”Elements are things that may either cause effects of be impacted. Basically, anything that could be a noun could be an element. Some specific examples could include:
- China
- Chinese business interests
- The impact of Chinese business interests on stability in Ghana
- Self driving vehicles
- Democracy
- Norwegian woman who enjoy opera Because there are so many different types of elements, many subdimensions would only apply to a specific selection.
This is probably the simplest dimension. Time is very one-dimensional and easy to understand in the context of history and the future. For example, one could analyze “modern aggriculture per decade from 1800 to 2000.”
inputs / outputs.
influencers/ influencees
changers / changees
impactor/ impactee